Students, faculty discuss ways to renew Antioch
The community meeting at Antioch College on Nov. 11
wasn’t business as usual. Most of the meeting was devoted to
a discussion in which members of the campus community were invited
by the college’s Renewal Commission to share their thoughts about
Antioch and its future.
Two questions were written on the large chalkboard in
McGregor Hall room 113, where the meeting took place. The first asked
community members to complete the statement, “An Antioch education
at its best, is…” The second question asked, “If
you could wave a magic wand and transform Antioch College, what would
it be?”
There was no shortage of answers to the questions. A
larger enrollment, harder classes, better organization, more racial,
economic and ability diversity, a better public image and more involvement
in environmental initiatives were among the students’ primary
comments.
The Antioch University Board of Trustees created the
Renewal Commission last summer when it empowered the university chancellor,
Jim Craiglow, and the board chairman, Dan Kaplan, “to establish
a special commission, to be known as the Sesquicentennial Commission
for the Renewal of Antioch College (the ‘Renewal Commission’)
to develop a plan, strategy and timetable for the renewal of Antioch
College.” Craiglow and Kaplan were also given the task of appointing
the members of the Renewal Commission. The Renewal Commission first
met on Sept. 30 and has continued to meet throughout the fall term.
The Renewal Commission consists of Antioch College and
Antioch University faculty and administrators, college alumni, and
financial, organizational and educational consultants. The members
of the commission include Andrzej Bloch, Tom Clough, Craiglow, Dan
Fallon, Everette Freeman, Mavis Gruver, Al Guskin, Jane Jervis, Kaplan,
Pat Linn, Laura Markham, Bonnie Scranton, Joan Straumanis, Peter Temes
and Carol Geary Schneider.
Several members of the Renewal Commission were present
at last week’s meeting to hear people’s thoughts about
the college. Kaplan told the audience that the commission is seeking
to ensure “long-term financial viability” for Antioch,
effective leadership, integration of the college and the university
and the upholding of Antioch’s educational ideal.
Kaplan also assured the audience that the meeting was
not their only chance to share their thoughts with the Renewal Commission. “This
is only a first step,” he said. “Clearly, we have more
time, and we’ll take it.”
In answer to the commission’s first question,
a faculty member responded that at its best, Antioch College is what
it claims to be. “It’s not a utopia,” she said. However,
she added, people at Antioch have trouble communicating across the
gap between the utopian concept of the college and its reality. She
also said she found it problematic that the Antioch Honor Code isn’t
really discussed on campus, suggesting new students learn the code.
Two students said that Antioch needs to increase its
enrollment and offer more classes each term. One of the students said
Antioch also needs more faculty. Several students said that classes
at Antioch were not demanding enough. “You can get more out of
class here if you’re motivated,” one second-year student
said. But, he said, “standards in general are low” at Antioch.
He also said that the co-op program, which, he pointed out, is one
of the main reasons students come to Antioch, needs to be revamped.
Others were concerned about their chances of getting
into graduate school after leaving Antioch. One student said that “there’s
a lackadaisical attitude here” and that some Antiochians can’t
meet the requirements for graduate school, although they meet the requirements
to graduate from Antioch.
Another second-year student said she thought it was
good that “classes have a lot of wiggle-room” at Antioch
and are accessible to students on different levels. But she added that
learning-disabled students are still not adequately supported.
Others said that Antioch is disorganized. “It’s
all in front of us, we just need to do it,” one student said,
stating that planning transforms anything.
A fourth-year said that at its best an Antioch education
would be consistent, complete, respectful, stable and reliable. “Antioch
is my home, this is my family,” she said. Her desire, she said,
was for Antioch to be “functional,” but as it is, students
end up running back and forth between departments because departments
don’t communicate with each other.
Another student said that because of the alternation
between study and co-op terms, different people are running things
each term, and this makes it difficult to implement new ideas.
One student expressed concern about Antioch’s
public image and said that a stronger media presence and a good Web
site would help the college. He said he would like Antioch to have
more influence and have the ability to express its liberal ideas to
a larger national audience.
Diversity was also a major concern of the students.
One first-year student pointed out that many schools have funds set
aside to support students of color. Others also said that Antioch needs
to recruit more minority students and students who are not from upper-middle-class
backgrounds.
Another student said that differently-abled students
are not being accommodated at Antioch. Some students don’t attend
Antioch because the campus isn’t accessible to them, she said.
A third-year transfer student expressed gratitude that
Antioch has enabled him to travel abroad, saying that the more experiential
and experimental Antioch is, the better it will be. He also suggested
that Antioch focus more on environmental issues and activism, projects
in which people can see the results of their work. A second-year also
said “environmental stuff” is important if Antioch is to
survive another 150 years, and suggested that Antioch should establish
a farm and “green operations” on campus.
— Evelyn La Croix