|
|
EDITORIAL
Support
for school levies is vital
This November’s
election may not be generating the kind of excitement that past contests
have in Yellow Springs, but there is one significant issue on the ballot
that deserves every voter’s attention: two property tax levies that
would provide essential funding for the Yellow Springs school district.
Local residents should maintain their steadfast support for the public
schools and pass both levies, which will help the district continue to
provide children in Yellow Springs with a quality education.
On the Nov. 4 ballot,
the Yellow Springs school board is seeking to renew, with a reduction
in millage, both of its property tax issues: a 1.2-mill permanent improvement
levy, Issue 11 on the ballot, and a 10.1-mill emergency levy, Issue 12.
The five-year permanent
improvement levy would generate $69,000 a year for technology needs and
school buses. If approved, the levy would go into effect next year. Voters
last approved this levy in 1998.
The emergency levy
would generate $1.06 million a year, or 17 percent of the district’s
revenue, for crucial operational costs, including salaries and benefits.
The levy would go into effect in January 2005, replacing the current emergency
levy when it expires at the end of the next year. The emergency levy was
last approved in 1999.
Both levies are important
for the district, but clearly more is at stake with the passage of the
emergency levy because it generates funds to pay for the district’s
most essential resource, its people. Superintendent Tony Armocida has
bluntly said that without the levy, “we couldn’t run the district.”
It is also important, however, for voters not to underestimate the importance
of the permanent improvement levy, since it will pay for, among other
things, new computers and software.
School officials
and supporters in their levy campaign have made a point of emphasizing
that the levies, as renewals and reductions, would result in a decrease
in property taxes for local residents. This is good news, and voters should
appreciate the fact that the district is trying to control expenses and
not overtax local residents.
Indeed, one could
hardly say that the district is flush with cash. The schools operate with
modest, but much improved, facilities. There are no extra staff, administrators
or teachers roaming the halls. The schools use their funds wisely, and
do not appear to be wasting taxpayers’ money.
Decreasing taxes,
however, is not the main point of this election. Maintaining a strong
school district is. By placing two levies on the ballot, school officials
are planning ahead for the district’s funding needs. With just two
votes, local residents can help solidify the district’s funding
for the next three to four years, helping school officials to account
for both immediate and future needs, such as staffing levels, educational
programs and contract negotiations with both of the district’s unions,
which are scheduled for next spring.
This smart, rational
move deserves voters’ support. Approving Issues 11 and 12 will help
the community’s most important asset, the schools, stay healthy
and in good financial shape. Everyone in the community benefits from that.
—Robert
Mihalek
|
|