| Council urged to resist Patriot Act
  At its meeting Monday, Oct. 20, a number of villagers 
        urged the Yellow Springs Village Council to take a stand against the Patriot 
        Act.  The act, which the federal government enacted in response 
        to the 9/11 tragedy, has created controversy due to the expanded powers 
        it gives to law enforcement agencies.  “There’s 
        a lot of frightening prospects,” said Chris Kintner about the act 
        which, he said, “strips away rights we take for granted. We need 
        to come together as a community and snuff it out.”  At issue was a resolution 
        which opposes parts of the Patriot Act, presented to Council by Joan Chappelle 
        of the Human Relations Commission. The resolution, proposed by the commission’s 
        Bill of Rights Defense subcommittee and drafted by subcommittee member 
        Don Wallis, was approved by the committee at a meeting last Saturday. 
        Other members of the Human Relations Commission are Council representative 
        Joan Horn, Sherry Walker, Saul Greenberg, Sterling Wiggins, Aida Merhemic 
        and Faith Patterson.  Although some encouraged 
        Council to take action Monday night, several Council members stated they 
        were not yet ready, since they first read the resolution the night before. 
        Council stated that it will take a position on the resolution at its next 
        meeting, Nov. 3.   The resolution reads, 
        in part, that “Whereas, several acts and orders recently enacted 
        at the federal level, including sections of the USA Patriot Act and several 
        Executive Orders, now threaten these fundamental rights and liberties:  • Freedom of 
        speech, religion, assembly, and privacy;  • The rights 
        to counsel and due process in judicial proceedings; and  • Protection 
        from unreasonable searches and seizures, all guaranteed by the Constitution 
        of the State of Ohio, and the United States Constitution and its Bill 
        of Rights;   Therefore, we the 
        Village Council of Yellow Springs, Ohio, acting in the spirit and history 
        of our community, do hereby request that:  1. Local law enforcement 
        continue to preserve all residents’ freedom of speech, religion, 
        assembly and privacy; rights to counsel and due process in judicial proceedings; 
        and protection from unreasonable searches and seizures even if requested 
        or authorized to infringe upon these rights by federal law enforcement 
        agencies acting under powers granted by the USA Patriot Act or orders 
        of the Executive Branch . . .”  The resolution also 
        requests that the Yellow Springs Police Department not engage in “detentions 
        without charges or racial profiling” and that the U.S. Attorney’s 
        Office, the FBI and the Ohio State Police regularly report to the Village 
        “the extent to and manner in which they have acted under the USA 
        Patriot Act of Executive Orders, including disclosing the names of any 
        detainees who are residents of Yellow Springs.”  The Patriot Act indicates 
        a “philosophical shift in the notion of justice” in this country, 
        said Dimi Reber, from assuming innocence until proven guilty to an initial 
        assumption of guilt.   The federal government’s 
        increased surveillance of Muslims in this country concerns Bill Houston, 
        who stated that “When we begin to attack certain religions it’s 
        not a big step” to attacks on other religions as well.  Similar resolutions 
        to the one presented to Council have been passed in 188 communities and 
        three states, including Oxford and Oberlin in Ohio, according to the resolution 
        supporters.  Council members’ 
        responses to the resolution were mixed.  “I want to 
        be clear that the wording makes it clear what the resolution is a statement 
        for,” said Council President Tony Arnett. “These kind of statements 
        can be horribly misinterpreted.”  While Council member 
        George Pitstick agreed that the Patriot Act had “gone too far,” 
        he expressed reservations about the resolution.  “I can understand 
        the reasons for it when we saw 3,000 people killed and have unknown people 
        in this country who came here to kill,” said Pitstick, who expressed 
        his concern that passing the resolution might hamper local police if someone 
        came to the village intent on terrorist activity.  According to Council 
        member Denise Swinger, who stated her support for the resolution, interim 
        Police Chief John Grote has “endorsed it. He’s okay with it.”  Council member Joan 
        Horn also supports the resolution and encouraged her fellow Council members 
        to take a stand.  “I feel very 
        strongly,” she said, “that this is something whose time has 
        come.”  —Diane 
        Chiddister       |