Issues debated, candidates presented at Men’s Group Candidate’s
Night
About 50 local residents
gathered in the Bryan Community Center meeting rooms last Thursday for
the annual Candidate’s Night, sponsored by the Yellow Springs Men’s
Group.
With just one competitive
race, for Miami Township Board of Trustees, debate seemed undermined by
lack of choice. Still, audience members didn’t seem to mind, and
they asked engaging questions about the issues and the candidates that
will appear on the Nov. 4 ballot.
The following is
a summary of what was said.
State Issue
1
Voters will decide
with Issue 1 whether to allow the state to issue $500 million in bonds
for investment in technological research and economic development in Ohio
over the next 10 years, Don Motley, a representative with the Ohio Department
of Development, said during his presentation.
The proposal is part
of Governor Bob Taft’s $1.6 billion “Third Frontier”
project to stimulate Ohio’s flagging economy. The plan aims to increase
high-paying jobs by investing in high-growth industries, including biosciences,
information technology and fuel-cell research. If Issue 1 passes, the
public investment should leverage $4.5 billion in federal and private
funds for research and job creation, Motley said. The total gain for the
state is anticipated to be $6 billion over 10 years, he said.
Audience questions
focused on accountability and the state’s ability to repay the bonds.
The public investment over 10 years is insignificant in relation to the
income the proposal is expected to generate, Motley said. The impact on
the state budget will be minimal even if the project is unsuccessful,
and if it is successful, it would repay itself many times over, he said.
YSI Incorporated
received a Third Frontier grant last winter to invest in a biotechnology
research and development project that could create as many as 50 jobs
in the area, local resident Richard Lapedes said.
Yellow Springs
school levies
With Issues 11 and
12 the Yellow Springs school district is asking voters to renew and reduce
an emergency levy and a permanent improvement levy for a total savings
of $409,000 in property taxes over the next five years.
The three-year emergency
levy would be reduced from 10.3 mills to 10.1 mills, and would bring in
$1.06 million a year, or 17 percent of the district’s budget. Funds
from the levy are used for salaries, utilities, instructional materials
and operating costs, Superintendent Tony Armocida said during his presentation.
The five-year permanent
improvement levy would be reduced from 2.2 mills to 1.2 mills. It would
generate $69,000 a year for educational technology and school bus purchases.
Armocida said that
the school board is committed to reducing taxes and “we’re
committed to maintaining the quality of our schools.”
Local residents wanted
to know how much the Yellow Springs school system spends per pupil and
what percent of the taxes generated from recent property reappraisals
would go to the schools. The school district, which has 692 students,
spends $8,600 per student, Armocida said, which is down by $600 from last
year.
The higher-than-expected
13 percent increase in reappraisal values generated an additional $200,000
for the schools, which offset a $140,000 loss in revenue when Vernay Laboratories
shut down its largest plant on Dayton Street and a $40,000 reduction in
state funding. The schools had a net gain of $20,000 from the reappraisal,
Armocida said.
Greene Memorial
levy
Greene Memorial Hospital
is asking voters to approve a replacement levy that would reduce the current
funding from 0.52 mills to 0.5 mills. The levy would generate $1.5 million
a year for the next five years, GMH levy committee representative Dave
Ferguson said.
The levy represents
less than 2 percent of the hospital’s operating budget, which GMH
would reinvest in upgrading and purchasing new medical equipment.
Greene County residents
have supported this levy since 1951. With the steady increase in property
values to offset a continuous rise in health care costs, the hospital
has been able to decrease the levy’s millage, Ferguson said. Whereas
when the levy was initiated a property valued at $100,000 would generate
$3 a year for the hospital, the same property today would generate $15
a year.
S corporation
tax issue
Regional income tax
representative Jeff Crissman came to explain Issue 26, which Village Council
placed on the ballot. Traditionally, S corporations have been taxed solely
on the distributive shares of their owners. Crissman said that an S corporation
was an “entity created by the federal government for federal tax
purposes,” and that federal income tracking made it difficult to
evaluate the impact of S corporation taxation on the community. The impact
would not be large in Yellow Springs, but it could vary from zero to $10,000,
he said.
Last year, the Ohio
General Assembly passed a bill requiring municipalities to get voter approval
to continue taxing out-of-state S corporations. Voting yes on Issue 26
would maintain the current taxation formula.
Lapedes and Council
member George Pitstick, who own or work for S corporations, offered their
own explanations to audience members, many of whom were obviously confused
about this ballot issue. The federal government does not tax S corporation
profits, only the income of company owners, Pitstick said.
An S corporation
could be a small company or a multimillion dollar corporation that doesn’t
pay federal taxes because its taxing responsibilities are passed on to
its owners to pay as personal income taxes.
“S corporation
owners are already privileged, and to discontinue to tax these businesses
is incorrect,” Lapedes said. “We do want to continue to tax
S corporation revenue.”
Yellow Springs
mayor
Though everyone is
better off having choices, Foubert said in a humorous presentation, he
is “delighted” to be running unopposed for his seventh term
as the mayor of Yellow Springs.
The mayor, who serves
a two-year term, is the head of the Village for ceremonial purposes and
presides over the Yellow Springs Mayor’s Court.
Foubert said that
he has run Mayor’s Court for the last 12 years as a community court,
where people can expect to be listened to when they come. The Yellow Springs
Mayor’s Court involves mostly misdemeanors, ranging from fights
to illegal liquor sales, he said.
Foubert said that
the maximum sentence he has ever imposed is a $1,000 fine and six months
in jail, and in his time in the mayor’s office he has only jailed
three people. When handling traffic cases, he said, his goal is to help
citizens get licensed, insured and informed so they can get back on the
road.
One resident asked
if the mayor could impose heavier fines for driving under the influence.
The mayor can impose a fine of up to $1,000, which can easily be reduced
to $350 on appeal, Foubert said. He said he prefers to offer appropriate
sentencing and achieve better control of the court process.
Foubert said that
he loves serving as the mayor of Yellow Springs. “I enjoy the community
values and try to live by them in court,” he said. “It’s
a joy to be your mayor, thank you for the opportunity.”
Miami Township
trustee
Two candidates are
running for one available seat on the Miami Township Board of Trustees:
incumbent Chris Mucher and local resident David Heckler. The winner will
receive a four-year term.
Heckler has had over
22 years of public service with the Clark County engineer’s office
and with the Village, where he served as assistant manager and manager.
In addition to his educational background in civil engineering and business
administration, he said that his professional experience has given him
familiarity with agricultural engineering, Village infrastructure and
financial and personnel managerial skills.
As a Miami Township
resident, Heckler said he has become more aware of township issues, which
include, he said, foremost, maintaining Miami Township Fire-Rescue. If
elected, Heckler said that he hopes to guide the completion of the Township’s
comprehensive land use plan in order to pursue economic development and
farmland preservation policies that accurately reflect the needs of local
residents.
Heckler also said
that he would make a point to meet farmers and encourage broad participation
by remaining available to talk to concerned citizens.
Audience members
questioned how candidates would balance property rights with other rights
to protect the environment. Heckler said he would seek public input through
hearings to build consensus on zoning issues to solve the issue.
Chris Mucher has
served seven years as a Miami Township trustee and is running for his
second full four-year term on the board. He said that he has “experience,
expertise and results,” backed up by a cumulative record of $500,000
of vehicle acquisition, $4 million in road repairs, a history of volunteer
recruitment from the township and many proposals that show planning for
the future.
He proposed that
the Township establish a farmland preservation fund, a comprehensive land
use plan and the Cooperative Economic Development Agreement with the Village.
As a small business owner, he said, he is available to the public every
day at his local place of business to talk about township issues.
To balance personal
property rights with environmental and other concerns, Mucher said that
he relies on the five member Township Zoning Commission to determine which
property rights supercede others.
In response to questions
about access to information, Mucher said that he supports as much public
input as possible. The public is invited to attend Township meetings,
browse the Township’s Web site and approach any of the trustees
with questions, he said.
Village Council
Three people are
running for three seats on Village Council: Council members Mary Alexander
and George Pitstick and local resident Jocelyn Hardman. The two candidates
receiving the most votes will receive four-year terms, and the candidate
with the third most votes will serve a two-year term.
Mary Alexander was
appointed to fill a vacancy on Village Council in the spring after Hazel
Latson resigned from Council. She and her husband, Bill Alexander, have
lived in the village for 40 years and have raised four children here.
She said that she
thinks the Village’s major concerns are population and economic
growth and responsible management of assets.
As a Council member,
Alexander said, she would promote Yellow Springs as an affordable place
to live, noting that safety and the volunteer emergency services make
the cost of living in town more valuable. Alexander said that she would
support Community Resources, a local community improvement corporation,
in its effort to build a commerce park in town.
Alexander said that
the public school system is a positive draw for families, noting that
she would work to increase enrollment.
In general, she said
that Council is a “community custodian” that must listen to
all perspectives in an impartial and fair atmosphere.
Noting that she ran
in a more contentious race for Council two years ago, Jocelyn Hardman
said that she is glad to be running again this year. Hardman, who was
raised in the village, said that she hopes to encourage more participation
among members of her generation who have returned to live in Yellow Springs.
Many of the issues
Hardman intends to work on come from her association with the Men’s
Group, whose cost of living report, she said, should shed some light on
local affordability issues.
Hardman said that
she plans to focus on attracting more residents to the village, encouraging
clean businesses to establish themselves in town, improving the quality
of existing housing and increasing the number and diversity of housing
in Yellow Springs.
When asked if Council
candidates would support a resolution to oppose the Patriot Act, Hardman
said she supported the civil liberties of those who come to the U.S. seeking
the freedom Americans have.
A road repair question
prompted Hardman to say that good street maintenance leads to responsible
fiscal management.
George Pitstick,
who is running for his second consecutive term on Council, has lived in
the village for over 40 years. He has also served on the Village Planning
Commission and the Village Board of Zoning Appeals.
As the CFO of a water
treatment plant company, Pitstick said that he has experience in financial
management, which he intends to use to establish sound fiscal management
of the Village’s budget. He said that he hopes to help the Village
be proactive in attracting businesses to town. He also said that he would
promote moderate housing growth, maintenance of Village infrastructure
and a solid wellhead protection plan.
“I will strive
for consensus, and I am willing to listen and actively seek out advise
for consensus,” Pitstick said. “I’m committed to keeping
Yellow Springs a place where we want and can afford to live.”
In response to the
Patriot Act question, Pitstick said that though the legislation had overstepped
its bounds, he supported a law that protected villagers from danger. Pitstick
responded to the road repair question by saying that Council made a list
of Village streets set for repair in the next 10 years. He also said that
he favored an in-house road assessment.
Pitstick also responded
to a question concerning the Caboose Bike & Skate on the bikepath,
saying that Council wants to allow a rental business to operate within
the bikepath’s right of way.
Yellow Springs
school board
Two candidates are
running for two seats on the Yellow Springs school board: incumbent Rich
Bullock and local resident Richard Lapedes. School board members serve
four-year terms.
Lapedes said that
the Yellow Springs schools have been among the best in the area for delivering
great value for the money. He said that he hopes to contribute to the
effort to attract more families to town to sustain the schools. Lapedes
said that he is interested in using public input to improve the board’s
decision-making processes and hopes to reach out to people for their ideas
and organize them in an appropriate manner.
Bullock was absent.
—Lauren
Heaton
|