Plan
board
recommends Council adopt new zoning district—
Planners
support commerce district
After an insistent
debate over the inclusion of an optional environmentally friendly clause
in a commerce park zoning ordinance, the Village Planning Commission agreed
Monday to give the proposed district its blessing.
The proposal, which
would create a “Mixed Commerce District,” now goes before
Council, which has final say over zoning changes. Council is scheduled
to hold the first of two readings on the proposal at its meeting Monday.
At its meeting Sept.
8, plan board voted 3–1 to pass the proposal to Council. The commission
chairman, John Struewing, members Bruce Rickenbach and George Pitstick,
who is Council’s representative on the board, voted yes; Cy Tebbetts
voted no. Dawn Johnson was absent.
Tebbetts strongly
objected to the proposal, saying that he thought the board was missing
an opportunity to encourage environmentally responsible business in any
commerce park that would be located in the mixed-use district. He recommended
that plan board support a proposal with sustainable requirements and voluntary
compliance incentives.
“I believe
that the ordinance should reflect the village’s commitment to an
eco-friendly park and that its inclusion in the ordinance assures that
Yellow Springs will contribute more than lip service to a principle we
virtually all endorse,” Tebbetts said. “If there is a financial
incentive, that’s what businesses respond to, and making it voluntary
creates a better feeling between the businesses and the village.”
Other Planning Commission
members and Village officials said that they supported an eco-friendly
park, however, they did not think it was appropriate to include incentives
in the zoning ordinance. The ecologically sustainable goals should be
pursued for the commerce park district, but the Village Zoning code is
not the right vehicle, said Rickenbach, who was the primary author of
the proposal plan board passed.
Rickenbach’s
proposal does contain some environmental criteria, saying that the district
would “promote environmentally conscious practices,” and that
certain practices that emit dust, smoke, gas and noise would be prohibited.
Planning Commission
has been working for three years to establish a zoning district that would
accommodate a local commerce park.
At one point, several
zoning proposals did cite specific environmental standards businesses
would have to practice. But plan board dropped such language after its
members could not agree on the meaning of sustainability or how to enforce
“eco-friendly” standards.
Both Village Zoning
Inspector Phil Hawkey and Village Manager Rob Hillard agreed that voluntary
incentives should be pursued outside of the Zoning Code, perhaps through
Community Resources, which is trying to find a developer to build a park.
But Tebbetts persisted,
encouraging the commission to at least allow his version of the ordinance
to be submitted alongside the official version passed by plan board. “I
feel very strongly about this, and plan board is passing something that
is very shortsighted,” he said. “We’re sticking our
heads in the sand.”
Other commission
members said they felt uncomfortable sending to Council two versions of
a zoning proposal.
Tebbetts relented,
offering to prepare a separate statement from the board recommending that
Council incorporate incentives for clean and environmentally responsible
business operations in the commerce park.
“Strike while
the iron is hot. Let’s bring ourselves into the 21st century with
environmental concerns. There are many communities doing it,” Tebbetts
said after the meeting, referring to a new eco-friendly industrial park
currently being developed in Fairborn. “It could be a synergistic
thing, an exchange with other areas that could be a nice extension of
the whole idea.”
—Lauren
Heaton
|